FishingBanter - View Single Post - OT-E: Leave it to the Brits.

**Ken Fortenberry[_2_]** · October 9th, 2008, 04:16 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Face it Rick, Palin is a category 5 moron from the snake handling
wing of the GOP and the only people on earth who refuse to recognize
that her candidacy is a preposterous farce are either rabid, cynical
partisans or morons themselves.
No, she isn't a moron, ...
snicker

No, of course not, she's just "intellectually challenged".

No, she isn't, but please, do take this attitude out in public...I'm
sure McCain will appreciate the support...
LOL !!

and no, her candidacy is no more of a farce than
Obama's. ...
Alrighty then, I'll mark you down as rabid, cynical partisan.

Here's a little exercise for folks - imagine you have just returned from
a 5 year trip into a remote jungle where you've heard no news in any way
related, even tangentially, to the election or candidates. While you're
on the flight back, a fellow passenger hands you an objective, unbiased
and rather detailed summary of both Obama and Palin, but with no
pictures and the names as "Senator John Doe" and "Governor Jane Doe,"
but doesn't identify the states represented. You are also given an
objective snapshot of the current situation in the US - i.e., nothing
partisan. You are then asked whether you think either person is ready
to be POTUS or Veep. You are then asked who you would like to see as
the POTUS and where these two rank on your list, if at all. The results
are surprising...well, devastating to rabid Obamanics...

Nonsense. Are you really saying that folks can compare Obama's
resume with Palin's and conclude that Palin is the better candidate ?

I mean, I have to ask because it just might be a comedy album. ;-)

Columbia, Harvard, teaching constitutional law at the University
of Chicago, state Senator and US Senator versus barely BS from
six schools, mayor and Governor hockey mom ?

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

You betcha. ;-)

Bet? How much?

Four million three hundred seventy-seven thousand.

--
Ken Fortenberry