View Single Post
  #8  
Old October 9th, 2008, 08:06 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,901
Default OT-E: Leave it to the Brits.

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:16:44 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Face it Rick, Palin is a category 5 moron from the snake handling
wing of the GOP and the only people on earth who refuse to recognize
that her candidacy is a preposterous farce are either rabid, cynical
partisans or morons themselves.
No, she isn't a moron, ...
snicker

No, of course not, she's just "intellectually challenged".


No, she isn't, but please, do take this attitude out in public...I'm
sure McCain will appreciate the support...
LOL !!

and no, her candidacy is no more of a farce than
Obama's. ...
Alrighty then, I'll mark you down as rabid, cynical partisan.


Here's a little exercise for folks - imagine you have just returned from
a 5 year trip into a remote jungle where you've heard no news in any way
related, even tangentially, to the election or candidates. While you're
on the flight back, a fellow passenger hands you an objective, unbiased
and rather detailed summary of both Obama and Palin, but with no
pictures and the names as "Senator John Doe" and "Governor Jane Doe,"
but doesn't identify the states represented. You are also given an
objective snapshot of the current situation in the US - i.e., nothing
partisan. You are then asked whether you think either person is ready
to be POTUS or Veep. You are then asked who you would like to see as
the POTUS and where these two rank on your list, if at all. The results
are surprising...well, devastating to rabid Obamanics...


Nonsense. Are you really saying that folks can compare Obama's
resume with Palin's and conclude that Palin is the better candidate ?


No, what I am really saying is that both have pretty slim records,
because, well, they both have pretty slim records.

I mean, I have to ask because it just might be a comedy album. ;-)

Columbia, Harvard, teaching constitutional law at the University
of Chicago, state Senator and US Senator versus barely BS from
six schools, mayor and Governor hockey mom ?


Hmmm...lessee...Hillary, 1 term Senator, no other elected office, Bill,
Governor, Kerry, 2 years as Lt. Gov (with Dukakis) and Senator, Bush,
Yale AND Harvard, Governor...

And as far as his "Constitutional Law" course:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW III: EQUAL PROTECTION AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.
40301. This course considers the history, theory, and contemporary law
of the post-Civil War Amendments to the Constitution, particularly the
Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The central subjects a the constitutional law governing
discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and other characteristics;
the recognition of individual rights not explicitly enumerated in the
Constitution; and the constitutional distinction between state and
private action. Throughout, students consider certain foundational
questions, including the role of courts in a democracy, and the question
of how the Constitution should be interpreted. The student's grade in
Mr. Obama's section is based on a take home examination.

And his vast body of legal scholarship (as of 2005)?

Publications:

Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (Times
Books/Random House and Kodansha Books). 1995

And his notable cases (as of 2005):

Um, well, ya see...I mean, well...um, it's like this... HEY! He was
too busy, OK? I mean, come on, be fair...he had only been a lawyer for
14 years...

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

You betcha.

HTH,
R