wrote in message
...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:01:50 -0400, JR wrote:

Sarah Palin finally took questions on Tuesday from her traveling
press corps on her campaign plane. Asked if she thought Senator
Obama was dishonest (about Ayers, apparently, but who knows?),

"I'm not saying he's dishonest, but in terms of judgment, in
terms of being able to answer a question forthrightly, it has two
different parts to this. The judgment and the truthfulness and
just being able to answer very candidly a simple question about
when did you know him, how did you know him, is there still - has
there been an association continued since '02 or '05, I know I've
read a couple different stories. I think it's relevant."

g

- JR

Um, OK. So what, in your opinion, is particularly amusing or wrong with
her answer?

TC,
R

richard, i swear, you just won't do. your response just tickles the hell
out of me (as they say down in rowan county).

truth is, if you could collect a similar statement from sen. obama, you
would be dismantling the damn thing on roff for a minimum of three hours,
daily, ad infinitum.

politics aside, the lady is simply an utter failure in her efforts to use
the english language as a method of communication.

yfitons
wayno