On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
http://elections.foxnews...

Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you.

ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was
the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page,"
but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa
Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley.

No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in
trouble, it was front and center for days. ...

More comedy from the right field bleachers.

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity
surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of
funds, misuse of funds, etc. And then, there's the lefties' old fav,
"bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!"
Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as
yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a
pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses
with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the
"candidate of morality" is OK. And there is some question as to her
being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an
affair with an existing aide.

And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement
acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly
engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in
any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were
pages or underage.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

LOL !!

Sad.

HTH,
R