On Oct 15, 5:40*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:41:26 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:44 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ...

... Gerry Studds never did
any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie.

Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. *That is rape. *End
of that story.

You're a liar, Louie. You post outrageous lies here about John
Kerry and now about Gerry Studds. If you had any shame, you
silly old fool, you'd be ashamed of yourself.

Oops, nope. *He did get the page drunk and have sex with him. *But it
wasn't "rape" in the criminal sense. *OTOH, it certainly was conduct
that should have garnered much more than a "naughty boy" from the House.
If it were today and a Republican Congressman did the same thing with a
female page, I'd bet _BIG_ that you'd in with other "liberals" yelling
and screaming about what a scumbag he was, suggesting it was "rape" or
nearly so. *Gerry Studds was a sorry piece of **** and embarrassment to
Congress, but, at least as far as is publicly known, he wasn't a rapist.

HTH,
R

He "had sex" with a male page who was 16. *That is statutory rape. *If
the kid was drunk and could not give his consent, that is rape,
period.

Gerry Studds raped a male page and made sexual advances at several
more.

Dave- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well I agree he should have been censored, Democrats are supposed to
stick to the Bimbos, male pages are reserved for Republicans. Its a
joke Louie, a joke. Honestly. kind of. :-))))

dave