On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:25:32 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
snip
I'm truly undecided - ...

Three weeks out, after an interminable election season, you're
*UNDECIDED* !! Un-****in'-believable.

That's right, "undecided." I don't feel either of these guys has a
large, clear and objective advantage over the other, and frankly, anyone
who claims that one or the other does is blindly partisan. Yep, I think
you and the rest of the Obamanics are just as blindly partisan,
uninformed, and wrong about this as the McCainiacs, demonstrated
repeatedly by your claims that Obama is SO much "better" of a choice
than McCain (or even Palin). I can understand someone leaning one way
or the other, indeed having chosen already, but to claim that one is
leaps and bounds ahead of the other? Hardly. If a neutral third party
stepped in and enacted completely what either of the these two promise
as they have promised, the US economy would be so ****ed up it would
take many years to recover. Obama impresses me as little more than
wannabe, cut-rate Bill Clinton (and no, that's in no way a compliment).
And McCain has said so much in an attempt to get elected that I'm not
sure the guy he once was is still even there and Palin doesn't exactly
give me the warm and fuzzies.

... I will say that I don't completely trust Obama's
motives, but McCain appears to have gone completely "pol." ...

What is that supposed to mean, you don't trust Obama's "motives" ?

Well, for one, he never answers a question, even easy, obvious ones,
just like a cut-rate, punk-ass Clinton. Of course, that alone doesn't
disqualify him from office IMO, but it means that I don't completely
trust him or his motives. I suspect, but am not 100% convinced, that he
nothing but a power-grasping little **** whose first and primary REAL
interest in all of this is Obama, goaded on by his bitch of a wife,
whose primary interest is herself...again, ala the Clintons.

HTH,
R