"rw" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
...


By your way of thinking the last true conservative was Bill Clinton.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.


Actually no. Newt and the Republican Congress got spending under control
for a couple years, and the dot.bomb boom brought in almost more money
than the Feds could spend. Clinton was a lucky POTUS.

The I guess Bush must have been the unluckiest mother ****er who ever
lived in the White House.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

No Bush and the Congress, Republican and Democrat controlled over the last 8
years sucked. I did not vote for Bush, I actually voted for Badnarik as both
the candidates were bad choices. I voted for Obama in the primaries as I am
a registered Dem and think the Hillary is a pox on the nation. Was Obama
the best candidate? Not by a long shot, neither was McCain. Obama ran a
better campaign, lots of it because he had 2x the money. The scary part is
who gave the money? A billion bucks does not come from $5 donations. He
owes some groups big time. I actually liked the Libertarian platform
better. I just hope he controls Pelosi, the 2nd dumbest pol from Calif.
(Boxer carries that title.) He most likely is only going to be President
for 4 years, as the troubles are beyond fixing quickly and he is most likely
going to look bad at the next election. Plus the Dem's will lose a lots of
seats in Congress in midterm elections, and there is still going to be a lot
of economic problems. As well as the open borders will likely not be
addressed. People losing their jobs to an illegal will not play well. I
just do not think Obama is ready for primetime. No seasoning. Is sad that
these two are what we had to choose from. Obama in 10 years in the Senate,
would most likely be a lot more ready to be the leader. Bush inherited a
crashing economy, and actually came out ok on that point. It is the rest of
the points where he failed and biggest point was the failure of the veto
pen.