On Nov 10, 5:19*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:29b4afb1-d366-4ff8-9f76-
:

Which being the case, you will doubtless have no trouble at all
refuting it scientifically eh?

No real need. *I can't even follow your plain text equations because of
formatting issues, but I don't see any derivatives in time or space, so I
know whatever point approximations you're making are probably overly
simplistic.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

If you are unable to follow it, then how do you know it is wrong?

You are just bull****ting again. If you don´t know what kgm/s² means,
then you are too dumb to follow the equations anyway. The unit
contains the space time derivatives. In longhand;

kilogrammes per meter divided by seconds squared. ( Aka, "Newtons")

Obviously you are even too dumb to tie a line to a fencepost.

Makes no difference to me what you dumbos write, but for anybody
interested, and capable of understanding it, it may be useful.

Also, the more you dumb assholes react without actually knowing or
saying anything at all germane, purely for "personal" reasons,
independent of the facts at issue, the more sensible people assume
that it is worth looking at.