Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

How cool is *that* ?!!? I append that one to every single post !

Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !



Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.

Yeah, "Fortenberry". I can think of no more insulting description.

Go ahead and post. You'll get the last word, but I won't pay any
attention to it. You're obviously not worth the bandwidth. But maybe
you should mention to your shrink that he should up your meds.