FishingBanter - View Single Post

**Ken Fortenberry[_2_]** · November 17th, 2008, 01:09 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Tom Littleton wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Bull**** is fine, racist bull**** is not. I try to be careful and
call the bull**** racist, not the people.

and calling an alternative opinion, or reading of statistics, racist is
wrong. Repeating it, endlessly, at nearly everyone who questions your
statistical analysis, is loony.
Assuming that most or a significant number of black voters are
black racists is racist bull****.

Well, you've called me racist, the entire South racist, etc., etc.,
etc., ...

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and talks like a duck,
it's usually safe to assume it's a duck. Either that or the title
of a comedy album. LOL !!

It doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with "statistical analysis".
There's nothing wrong with calling racist bull**** exactly what
it is. And I fully intend to do just that.

Ken, I like you, but you are one of, if not _the_ most blindly racist
people on ROFF.

That one's getting a lot of use lately, the old "I know you are
but what am I" from kindergarten.

--
Ken Fortenberry