Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
And so it starts. The right-wing nitwits launch their ridiculous
brand of revisionism as a pre-emptive strike against historic
ridicule. Shrub lied us into a disastrous war,

Prove he lied. So far nobody can do that.

Did Saddam Hussein have anything to with 9-11 ? No. Was
Saddam Hussein's government conspiring with Al Qaeda ? No.
Did Saddam Hussein posses WMD's which could be a threat to
the US ? No. Did Saddam Hussein pose any threat at all to
the US ? No. Bush lied and only a partisan nitwit could
claim otherwise.

tarnished American
prestige with torture,

In your opinion and the opinion of his opponents. But not in the
opinion of all the courts.

Gawd, you're an idiot. Courts don't issue opinions on American
prestige, you ****ing moron.

sat idly by as New Orleans drowned,

Yeah, he seeded the clouds ...

No nitwit, he sat idly by after the storm when his government
should have been there to help.

screwed
the Justice Department with political shenanigans,

But that kind of action was OK under the previous administrations of
Clinton, ...

BWAHAHAHAHA !! You right-wing nitwit dimbulbs are so predictable
it's hilarious.

censored science

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....

You think that's *funny* ? Man, you're dumber than you look and
I wouldn't have thought that possible.

and let the financial market spiral so far out of control we have
a worldwide crisis of unprecedented proportion.

He certainly inherited a mortgage crisis in its infancy and didn't do
anything about it. But the economic problems were already in place 10
months BEFORE he was sworn in. He just didn't do much about them.

There you go again, it's all Clinton's fault. Hilarious, well
mostly it's pathetic but there's no sense looking backwards so
let's just go with hilarious.

--
Ken Fortenberry