On Feb 6, 12:27*pm, rw wrote:
Do you seriously think that a company founded on Seventh-day Adventist
principles could endorse a doper?

Yeah, I do. There were better ways for Kellogg to handle this.
Whatever W.K. Kellogg's priciples may have been, demonizing Phelps'
actions or abandoning the potential of this pretty good kid probably
wouldn't have fit therein. Kellogg is a $12 billion company; its
actions aren't based on SDA principles, they're based on $$$
principles.

(And "doper"? Now, the one incident may not have been the only
incident, but I seriously doubt Phelps is a chronic or habitual pot
smoker. One time gets you the label "doper"? Geez, you sound like my
father.)

Joe F.