"DaveS" wrote in message
...
Who said anyone should be denied a trial and a lawyer.

You were. Or, at least suggesting denying legal appeals.

Listen up . . .

we're reading here, not listening. But, carry on......


I said defending murderers CONVICTED of AGGRAVATED murder. Convicted
means they have ALREADY had their trial. I didn't say they shouldn't
work thru the political process to change the law. if thats their
issue. And I didn't say folk shouldn't vote whatever way they choose.

still, you implied that folks shouldn't be allowed to exercise legal means
to prevent exectutions, if I read you correctly. As if executing someone
like the person you cite, was going to deter the next deranged soul from
doing something equally heinous. You almost seem to have some sick sort of
blood lust going on this matter.


Capisch?

do you mean 'capiche'? Pass the calimari, old Dave's going all Siciliano on
us, now!

It bothers me that a determined minority can turn our justice
system and corrections system into a hellish nightmare for the
majority of law abiders and law breakers, based on their need to
protect a few monsters that they personally would be too gutless to
guard, or even have the stomach to look at a photo of the victims, and
parade their hypocracy as if they were morally superior.

my, my!! Didn't we get our righteous indignation up today? Spare me. Active
minorities have fostered change, for better or worse, in our society since,
well since forever. You can't cherry pick which issues can and cannot be
raised, IMO.

Don't even know what the F--- this means. As a kid I had goats and
chickens, and dogs. We ate the chickens (and rabbits and pheasants and
an occasional squirrel if hungry enough) and drank the goat milk. If
guinea pigs weren't rat like, or you could have milked them I would
have . . . . whatever.

we had guinea pigs around when I was a kid. Dogs and horses, too. We ate
none of them, and I wouldn't recommend milking a dog, FWIW.

yeesh, as they
say...
Tom