On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:42:29 GMT, Tim Lysyk wrote:

wrote:
Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...ack-Obama.html

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

But are the the painting's indicative of the economic and terrorist
threats the US faces, and if so, are they
Obama's fault, Bush's fault, or Clinton's fault?

Mainly, I think they are indicative that just because one has access to art
materials doesn't mean that one should take advantage of that access...and the
fault is purely that of the respective, er, "artists"

I know it when I don't see it,
R

Tim Lysyk