wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
What leads you to believe that the guy is not qualified to be
an associate director in the public liaison office ?

What leads you to believe he is...? Here's a rhetorical question for you - what
you have said if Bush (or more likely, someone had recommended to him as a
political move) had appointed someone with such a resume to such a post?

I don't even know what an associate director in the public liaison
office does, and I suspect you don't either. So I wouldn't have
said, or snickered, or smirked, or sniped anything at all. Besides
having played a stoner in a movie what would disqualify him for a
low level job in the Executive Office Building ? And I suppose you
believe Leonard Nimoy is a Vulcan, right ?

Like I said, you're just beancounter with a better vocabulary.
Every day it's a new smirk, a new snicker, some new proof that
Obama is a screwup and that electing him was a mistake.

Nope. It still remains to be seen what kind of POTUS he'll be, but yeah, thus
far, he does look every bit the rank amateur he is.

I'm sure he must look that way to a rabid partisan but most
Americans don't think so.

After eight long years of rule by a party whose core tenet is
that government is incompetent (and who worked hard to prove it),
the smart folks are back in Washington. Smart folks are now
encouraged to pursue public service instead of being told that
public service is for the shmucks and losers

Yet again, you show you don't know, and therefore, don't understand, ...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, the same old tired bull****. The only person
on earth who knows and understands is Professor Dean hisownself.

--
Ken Fortenberry