wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
I don't even know what an associate director in the public liaison
office does, and I suspect you don't either.

You suspect incorrectly. And actually, you probably know more about it than you
realize, but didn't associate the title and office with the work/job - Mary Beth
Cahill and Charles Colson are two that come to mind, as well as Ford's, whose
name escapes me at the moment - Broomsky or something, who really had a job
after Nixon/Colson. While this position isn't exactly National Security
Advisor, it ain't nothing, and especially so for an administration promising so
much "transparency" and public "openness."

So I wouldn't have
said, or snickered, or smirked, or sniped anything at all.

So IOW, you are admitting you have no idea what the position is ...

Uh huh. But at least I'm honest enough and smart enough, (or is it
intelligent enough ;-), to admit I don't know. You don't have a
****ing clue either but you figure if you can't dazzle 'em with
brilliance, baffle 'em with bull****. You're all about the bull****.

Besides
having played a stoner in a movie what would disqualify him for a
low level job in the Executive Office Building ?

IIRC, it's a direct report position and IAC, it's not exactly "low-level."

Good gawd, what a pantload. Direct report position, LOL !! All you
had to do was look at the Whitehouse web page.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/opl/bios/

The only person on that page who is in a direct report position is
Valerie Jarrett. Charles Colson, LOL !! The guy is going to be an
associate director, not an assistant director, not the director,
not the Senior Adviser, a low-level associate director.

And
no, his playing a stoner (or really, having once BEEN a stoner) doesn't
"disqualify" him, but again, you are the one doing the assuming - you assume
that his resume does qualify him all the while admitting you don't have a clue
as to what would or should qualify or disqualify him.

Turns out I have a hell of a lot more clue than you do. And you were
the one who assumed he had something to smirk about, I just assumed
you were full of ****. As usual. One can hardly go wrong in assuming
that you're full of it. ;-)

I'm sure he must look that way to a rabid partisan

Oh, irony, thy name is Fortenberry...

I have never denied being a partisan Democrat, you're the one
trying to perpetrate some ridiculous non-partisan fiction.

but most Americans don't think so.

Asked 'em all, did ya? ...

Ever heard of polls ? Oh right, I forgot. Polls are only for those
who can afford them, us poor folk can't possibly have access to all
your top secret data analysis. LOL !!

--
Ken Fortenberry