On Apr 29, 5:44*am, wrote:
SNIP
Either way, as one of the rare informed voters in PA or anywhere else, good
luck...

TC,
R


Here, let me help you.

1. Why did Specter switch and why does Obama now support him?
a. Duh, because politicians try to get elected?
b. Because the Pres. needs his vote?

2. Why are you focusing on Specter?
a. Because it would be nice if the public didn't notice that your dead
ender friends in Congress have been filibustering most of Obama's
health appointments in the face of an epidemic?
b. Because you have finally done the required reading on the Bush/
Cheney torture initiatives and learned that the definition of pain you
said was weenie level, turns out to be ORGAN FAILURE, among other
things.
c. To spin your version of "non-partisanship" which presently ignores
the FACT that Specter could not have been re-elected so many times in
P.A unless MANY DEMOCRATS crossed party lines and voted for the man,
not the party.

Here, you want a good venue to work your magic? Lots of complexity,
mixed loyalties, etc? Wait for it . . .

Rep. Jane Harman, (D Calif), caught on NSA tape trading help for
Israeli Spies to get Intel Chairmanship.

Jane was caught red handed on tape bartering her help in getting
indictments surpressed for 2 Israeli agents, working as AIPAC
lobbyists, who are charged with spying. The targets of the spy cell
were the congressional intelligence committee members and staff.
Buried by the Bushies, and a hot potato for the Obamites, anonomous
and angry intell professionals are leaking info on this tape, while
Jane and the Israeli lobby spins an "illegal NSA tapping of Congress"
story, to keep the media away from the espionage part of the story.
The intell pros and some in the FBI are angry because sensitive
information and technology they believe was passed thru the
"lobbyists" has appeared in equipment sold by the Israelis to folks
not necessarily friendly to the US. Even one of your fave whipping
girls, (Pelosi) is involved.

Dave