On Nov 29, 8:37*pm, wrote:


This has been an issue for several years.

No ****?

From everything I've heard, there's
nothing dangerous in the substitution - IOW, it isn't an attempt to sell "bad"
fish, but rather, an attempt to sell a cheaper fish for a more expensive one.

No ****?


The funny thing is that most people couldn't tell the difference between the
"real" fish and the substitute.

Probably not.....but I'm sure we all know someone who can. Hey
tommie.......

I caught a sushi bar in NY trying to sell
tilapia as "tai" - they may have well been "conned" on it, but....IAC, granted,
"tai" is a somewhat generic term in and of itself, but still, trying to call
tilapia "tai" is pushing things...

god you make us wet.

TC,
R-

Idiot.

g.