On Jan 21, 5:50*pm, Giles wrote:
On Jan 21, 6:33*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

"jh" wrote in message

John

P.s. I'll save Giles the trouble

idiot

you didn't really have to add that last part. You've clearly shown your
intellect without tacking on such a concise self-descriptive tag after your
name.......

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * sheesh!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom

Nicely said.

I like that.

giles
like, who wouldn't have guessed, right? * * *

ok, i'm begining to get it - what we need then is good income, but not
income at the expense of others- that about right? Also, since its
health insurance is too profitable for the ins. co's - they need to be
eliminated. I think I'm catching on.

What about say, auto insurance, liability insurance for contractors?
(there is good one to eliminate- lets start on that one next-ok?
Someone is making too much here, (I just lost $25,000 worth of small
equipment yesterday to theft - insurance is already denying coverage)

how about work comp? i like the idea of eliminating those guys too.-
they cost me a fortune every year - obviously that has to be wrong. I
mean for structural steel work, i pay almost as mcuh insurance as I do
wages (75% IIRC)

And pensions- multiemployer pension funds are in deep dark **** right
now, yet they are a huge expense for those of us unlucky enough to pay
into them, and are financially liable for them if they fail (thank you
IRS). We need to get started on those while we are fixing things.

this could be good, i see now. ve vill all march together like gut
little vorkers and ve vill sing happy songs, for uncle joe, er sam.

you know rose colored glasses work really well shooting in certain
light conditions. not so much in the real world.

I think I need to get a job where someone else gets to worry all night
about this ****, i'll just worry my empty little head about whether I
should fish the Madison this weekend, or maybe the Clearwater? what
do you think?

john

knuclehead