On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:53:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:15:18 -0700, "Bill McKee"


and if he hadnt rescued the economy? what life would she have with 25%
unemployment?

of course you wont answer....




You sound more stupid each day.

so now im a republican?

And more racist.

so now i'm DEFINITELY a republican?


Your wife know you are
posting racist comments? Might get her fired. We have near 25% real
unemployment.

apples and fish. by your measurement, then, in 29 we have 50% real
unemployment

is that what you prefer? why do you hate the darkie president?


What has the deficit spending accomplished in reducing
unemployment, except for saving some mostly overpaid government jobs?

it's generated 1.5M jobs and kept unemployment at 10% instead of 25%

you, being a right wing shill, are unhappy because the rich are only
making billions instead of trillions.

The
states are in deep debt due to overspending and over employment. We could
have increased real jobs for less money by letting all taxpayers have a free
ride for the year. And you would not be looking at Goldman Sacksus giving
out billions in bonus money. The Goldman-sacks that got 100 cents on the
dollar for debt, while all others got 3 cents on the dollar. Paulson and
Geitner have to protect their former employer and investments.

that's because bush and his cronies gamed the system to hold the
middle class hostage to the interests of your rich friends