Thread
:
Cluuuuck, cluck, cluuuuk
View Single Post
#
6
April 2nd, 2010, 02:39 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,901
Cluuuuck, cluck, cluuuuk
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 06:47:34 -0600, rw wrote:
On 4/2/10 6:05 AM,
wrote:
Whoa, now - I never said, nor do I think that Obama is a (or "all politicians"
are) "lying ****bag(s)" - that said, you are perfectly entitled to your rather
extreme opinion. Now, if you had said that he was just another politician whose
mouth often greatly overloads his ass, we'd be in complete agreement. I said it
then, and I'll say it again now - I see nothing special whatsoever about Obama
with the exception of his being the first (known, obvious) bi-racial POTUS.
Other than that, from everything I've seen and heard, he's just another
(pre-freakout) Britney Spears pop-pol who happened to really hit the jackpot.
Bush had more "true core" and Clinton had, by leaps and bounds, a better mind
AND better political instincts. He's the left's answer to Reagan, but at least
Ronnie managed to futz around and accomplish a few things between all the
whip-'em-up empty speeches - his "tear down this wall" shtick, while in and of
itself, was pretty much rhetoric, but he was also among the more prominent
_public_ reasons that it did come down.
You, and I suspect a good portion of the Tea Baggers, aren't angry just
because Obama is black. You're angry because he's black and smarter than
you.
And speaking of people who often let their mouth greatly overload their ass -
HEEEEERE'S STEVIE!!
And IAC, everything else aside, why would _anyone_ be "angry because he's black"
when he isn't "black?"
HTH,
R
[email protected]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by
[email protected]
Find all threads started by
[email protected]