On Sep 1, 7:38*am, wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:27:50 -0500, wrote:
2) Where he was born - from all the reasonable evidence offered thus far, it
seems pretty clear he was born in Hawaii, but if not, it is a non-issue. *Under
the intent of Constitution, he is eligible to be POTUS. *Bury that issue and
then bury the shovel.

Let me add, however, my opinion of the "non-issue" of it is from a purely legal,
Constitutional sense. *If, in the _extremely_ remote chance it did turn out that
he and others had lied/conspired to conceal those facts, that would be a whole
'nuther issue. *IOW, if he had been born in Kenya (or wherever) and had always
disclosed that fact, but all other facts of his birth and life remained the
same, he would be eligible. *But since his turning out to having been born in a
location other than Hawaii and Forty turning into an Obama-hating Reagan
worshipper seem to have equal chances of occurring, bury the issue and then bury
the shovel...

TC,
R

O.k. Nothing to say.....got it. So then, what's the purpose of years
of cavilling bull**** verbiage?

Seriously.

g.