On 9/30/2010 8:25 AM, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2010-09-30 07:30:04 -0400, jeff said:

On 9/29/2010 7:44 PM, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2010-09-29 18:24:23 -0400, jeff said:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp



How

about

a rational, fair Democrat's voice?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39517

It works. Obamaism doesn't.

Dave



dave...do you remember the tax rate during that period?

I remember being VERY poor as a First Class Petty Officer in the Navy. I
remember that JFK gave me a wonderful gift by lowering my taxes
*drastically*, and improving the military.

you might go back and review the tax rates...context can be important.


wtf is "Obamaism"?

Call it Obamanomics. It sure as hell doesn't work. Our country is losing
its greatness and becoming a 3rd world nation. If we continue on this
path, there WILL be a revolution. Count on it. People are ****ed, even
the poor ones. My grandchildren (the three grown and working ones) are
very angry at what WE have done to their future. They realize that we
have a president that is good at three things: Campaigning, spending,
and blaming.

Dave

hmmm...funny how you were so reserved and accepting during bush years.
the anger is misplaced.

you really need to broaden your information sources and seek a more
balanced pool of data providers. federer?? ...c'mon. there is plenty
to constructively criticize in a reasoned, fair, and balanced
manner...as there always has been.

the process of reasoning really ought to involve more than just finding
those who say what you already believe or want to believe...

jeff

jeff