On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:46:43 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:


"daytripper" wrote in message
.. .
On 26 Dec 2003 18:14:03 GMT, irate (Dave LaCourse) wrote:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/j...20031226.shtml

Coming from Jacoby that's almost coherent, founded or not...

Readers should understand that Jacoby is the Wingnut's Wingnut, well to
the
right of Attila the Hun, and loses no opportunity to prove it in The
Boston
Globe...

/daytripper (Frankly, the guy is a scary moron. How he got any byline,
I'll
never know, never mind one in The Boston Globe...)

Interesting. If your analysis of Jacoby is right....and I trust your
judgment in these matters....you've got to wonder about his motivation in
writing a piece like this. He got the facts pretty much straight and there
doesn't seem to be any overt agenda glaring forth. In fact, the piece was
quite coherent and informative, if not exactly news.

Wolfgang
oh, and you should be ashamed of yourself for making old women cry.


I can only believe it is a form of self-inflicted penance for another year of
his maleficence in print...

/daytripper (tweren't nearly enough)