Fish may eventually populate (or be planted) in a body of water. It does not
give that fish, protected or not, eminent domain. Otherwise one could go
plant a protected species in a watershed for drinking water, then turn off
the faucets. Get a clue guy. Other than Kokanee, I know of no other salmon
that "lives" in a reservoir. Point is don't pollute this NG with political
crap, especially ficticous political BS.
Chris

"Greg Pavlov" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:46:18 -0800, "Chris HIll"
wrote:

Typical lying from the looney left. Just like all these wannabe political
analysts that know absolutely nothing except how to cut and paste tripe
into
their brains and bother folks in an outdoor oriented newsgroup. Take this
a$$wipe for example, he claims the administration killed 30k salmon due
to
the agricultural needs of the area. Dig down just one thin layer of
information and we see that this is a Fuc*** reservoir that was built
SPECIFICALLY for the farmer's irrigation. Natural habitat my A$$.


Are you saying that the salmon lived in the reservoir ?

Many happy dittos in the new year !