says...
Ah - I see your problem - you think wingnut screeds outweigh "years of the
lowest unemployment in decades, responsible budgets, the end of deficit
spending, a country others trusted, respected and wanted to emulate".

And I see your problem - you think Clinton was personally responsible
for all of that. In all actuality, Clinton was responsible for much
more. It could be said that he was partially responsible for 9/11 by
not taking bin Laden seriously and doing far too little to bring about
bin Laden's early demise. I bet he regrets not taking Sudan up on their
offer of handing him over to the US now... Then there is the fact that
some people are blaming Clinton for our high unemployment rates and a
fair argument could be made that he is somewhat responsible for that by
promoting and eventually signing NAFTA.

This is pretty old but gives a fairly accurate picture of what NAFTA has
gained us:
http://user.icx.net/~pace/nafta.html

Responsible budgets you say? You are right! Thank God for that
Republican Contract With America.
http://www.etherzone.com/2001/pric071601.shtml

You want to play Link War? Bring it on!

Okay, then "war" it shall be. g

http://www.newsmax.com/clinton2.mp3
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/09/03/clinton.bin.laden/
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.sh...002/8/12/24124
http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/10/22/45547
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D29B53757
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...6/172958.shtml
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=23999
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,3148,00.html
http://www.s-t.com/daily/03-96/03-05-96/1clinton.htm
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,3148,00.html
http://www.youdebate.com/DEBATES/travelgate.HTM
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/ope...9/kosovo2.html
http://www.conservativenews.net/InDe...19990405e.html
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/...inton.lincoln/

I've barely scratched the surface so far. :-(

It will take decades to recover from the mess the Smirking Chimp has created.
The US simply cannot afford another term.

I pretty much agree with that and will have a hell of a hard time
justifying a vote for Bush should I choose to do so. I totally agree
with some of the things that he has done but am totally opposed to
others (deficit, the Great American Rip off courtesy of Cheney, Bush and
Halliburton, etc). Personally, I am pretty disgusted with our "system"
right now even though it is technically "business as usual."

As relevant today as it was when first penned and applies to BOTH
parties:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2EE41757

/daytripper (I bet you think Ann Coulter *isn't* a two-bagger, too ;-)

To be honest with you, I don't think of Ann Coulter at all. Based on
the pics I have seen when I checked google, I think I could do her with
the aid of a twelve pack. As my friend used to say, "You can drink an
ugly woman pretty, but you can't drink a fat woman thin!" She's not
nearly as ugly as Hillary. Hillary is a triple bagger and would require
an oil tanker full of brew. bseg
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt (at) yahoo to reply via email)
For Conclave Info:
http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt...nConclave.html