Thread: waders rant
View Single Post
  #47  
Old March 30th, 2004, 05:19 PM
Calif Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default waders rant


"Hooked" wrote in message
...
"riverman" wrote in message
...


Agreed. I got a pair of breathables a few years back that were a bit

snug
in
the belly because I needed them postehaste, they were half-price, and

they
were the only thing in the shop that was close to my size. I was never

truly
comfortable wearing them, as I was always concerned about ripping them

out
if I ever went down on a knee midstream. Even lacing up my boots was a

bit
on the edge. The silver lining was that I got robbed in South Africa,

and
with my insurance money I bought (with the assistance of Frank Reid) a

very
comfortable pair of breathables that fit a tiny bit large, but with the

wide
belt Frank chose for me, I can 'bunch up' the excess fabric and make

them
right. Its like the difference between a pair of shoes that are a

half-size
too small, and a pair of sandals that are just perfect.



And then there's always the problem of boot foot waders. You buy a pair of
waders to fit your feet, and they aren't long enough in the inseam, or too
tight in the waste. Or vice versa.

But then it also happens with stocking foot waders too. Buy them for the
waste size and the inseam is too short.

Why can't they make waders that fit the majority of those who wear them?
Seems like they got a few special order sizes when they were an upstart
company, and then just stuck to those few sizes.



I just think the Koreans, do not realise how tall we are. I wear size 14
shoes and the Red Ball boot foot waders were the only ones that were long
enough in the inseam when I used boot foots for duck hunting. The Korean
waders were always about 6" short in the crotch. I think my latest
neoprenes are Hodgeman and they are fine.
Bill