Particle Salad wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

Actually, there are vanishingly few C&R purists and exactly zero C&K

purists

who have made their presence known in this news group. This is one of the
two major reasons that the entire argument is so tedious and unrelievedly
stupid. The other, of course, is that there is no issue.


I'm pretty close to being a "C&K purist" I suppose, and I'm still here...
even if I don't post all that much this time of year.

That's an oxymoron. You can't be "pretty close" to being a purist of any
kind. You either are one, or you aren't. It's like someone claiming he's
a "dry fly purist" because he only uses wets when the fish aren't rising.

A C&K "purist" would not necessarily eat every fish he catches (no
matter how disgusting it might be), but he would certainly kill every
fish he catches (no matter how illegal it might be).

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.