Ken Fortenberry wrote:


No, not really. While the typical top-poster is clueless and stupid and
you seem eager to describe yourself in those terms I would say that you
are better described as lazy, inconsiderate and pertinacious.

yup...excellent. and you haven't even met rachel yet. she agrees,
except for that pertinacious thing...she was unsure of its meaning
initially, but once i read the definition to her, she said, and i quote:
"damn, he nailed your ass."

btw...is bush's tie vibrating on anybody else's tv screen... talk
about a pertinacious prick.

actually, i agree i'm stupid and clueless, perhaps lazy, rarely
inconsiderate, definitely pertinacious. your scale of lazy and
inconsiderate is very different than mine...but, it does make for
interesting reading...

jeff (do not look at shrub's tie...aaiieeeee!!! it's hypnotic...i...i...
i'm gonna re-enlist, stop using empty words that embolden, my country
tis of thee, unscom, hiding...hiding...afraid of being caught...he was a
danger...uh, what was the question?...the oilfields... aaarrghhh...i
wouldn't be happy if i were occupied either...my blood wasn't
boiling...i was angry and sad...i grieve for...you know)