wrote...
On Tue, 11 May 2004 12:45:04 -0600, Warren wrote:


On a serious note, I think the reason why you dismiss and make fun
of such examples is that you are afraid to examine the logic and
rationale behind them.


The reason I dismiss it is very, very simple:
I can take a gun, point it at your head, and
with a simple twitch of a finger I can kill
you with it. On the other hand, no matter
what I did I would not be able to get a Golden
to do any worse than lick your hand. And that
is the long and short of it.

Once again, you are arguing the wrong thing. I thought I explained
it rather well, but here it is ONCE AGAIN for YOU.

" I am not making the
comparison that golden retrievers are as dangerous as firearms, I am
comparing perceptions of usefulness. I am saying that just because
you or Willi view concealed weapons as being useless, that doesn't
make them so for everybody else. I am saying that it is just as
wrong as the notion that you should be able to tell others what to
drive, eat, etc."

Are you getting it yet?
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt on either yahoo or earthlink to respond via email)