"Padishar Creel" wrote:
You got that right! I was fishing in about 10 feet of water, and kept
my
fly near the shoreline. Also, I used only abour 4' of leader. I
fished
where the Washougal (clearer water) met the Columbia channel. I went
to
school on some of the other fisherman. I think I did okay because of
three
factors. One, I could keep my fly at the right depth longer than some
of
the spin fisherman, two, my hook was RED and I'm guessing that helped
in
attracting the Shad and three, the Shad were pretty thick today (or
so said
the spin fisherman). I wonder if the rain we just rec'd did anything
to
cause more numbers of Shad to be moving????. Maybe the Shad experts
will
arise and give their thoughts.

The car top boat thing was actually in reaction to your TR on Shad. I
saw
your link and decided to try the Washougal based upon the info
contained
there. By the way, I got mud on everything I took today, so I had a
major
mess to clean up -- there must be better places to fish for these
guys. I
wonder if they run up the Washougal. That would be more fun and less
mud.
As to if the Shad stay around, you got me there...Lets have a TR from
the
Great Slave Lake when you get back...

Disclaimer *** what I know about shad would rattle in a thimble ***
Hell I
don't even have a single shad fly in my entire collection....

Chris


I'll definitely be posting a TR. I leave in the morning, pictures from
Friday show ice everywhere, so it's going to be tough to find some
edges that are melted out. Maybe ice fishing will be the whole deal?

As for not having a shad fly, you proved you do when you found
something that would catch 16 of the buggers.

Thanks for the info,

Chas
remove fly fish to reply
http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html
San Juan Pictures at:
http://home.comcast.net/~chasepike/wsb/index.html