I'd like to see the same study done with a control section established in the
no fishing area furthest away from the C&R area. This area would be required to
have the same amount of human activity as the C&R area, but with no actual
fishing. In other words, people would put in the same number of man hours
wading and walking the bank of this section as in the C&R section, without
actually fishing. I'm thinking that the amount of human activity in the C&R
section is causing some fish to move out in numbers high enough to be a
significant component of the 20%.


George Adams

"All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of
youth that doth not grow stale with age."
---- J.W Muller