"Flyfish" wrote in message
...
Scott Seidman wrote in
. 1.4:

Actually, science does pretty well under conservative governments that
are willing to spend into deficit, if Reagan can be used as an
example, but Bush isn't doing very good things for science at all.

Scott


I would argue that hard sciences like physics did well under Reagan, less
popular sciences such as environmental sciences fared poorly.

Flyfish

Less popular? Your fellow pointy-heads in Maine are all adither over the
latest hotbutton topics in theoretical physics, are they?

Imbecile.

Wolfgang