View Single Post
  #10  
Old July 9th, 2004, 02:58 AM
InfoAge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oh, mama...can this really be the end?


Scott Seidman wrote in message:


Why is the DEC statement any less
important or reliable than the Caucci opinion?


NYS DEC?

I don't recall them in the article.

NYC DEP. Yes.

And, NYC DEP realiable?

Get real Scott.
..............


To tell you the truth, I haven't even looked at the FUDR plan in that
much detail.


www.fudr.org

Please spend a few minutes getting to know the plan since you *are* a local
TU officer.

Right?
.........

There are probably parts of the plan that are fine, except
for the 600cfs demand. All I know is that I've watched the FUDR goings
on and interactions with other sportsmen and environmentalist in the
state, and I know that I don't like how FUDR treated them.


Nope.

Try how NYS Council treated FUDR.

Reread their quarterly report.

It's in print. I believe there might be a retraction in the next issue.
...............


I know that
every article you post seems to exaggerate flow problems on the Delaware
and blame the new release policy for the flow problems...[snipped for the

sake of sanity]

NY Times
NJ Star-Ledger
Newsday

Try:
google / news / upper delaware river