wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:30:56 -0400, GregP
wrote:
But so far, I've yet to see a single one of Kerry's
people, including the unfortunately-named Tad Devine, come out and say
"these vets are wrong, and here's why..."

"Kerry's people" don't have to; others already have.

Again, nope. For the most part, nothing "the vets" are saying has been
shown to be _untrue_ . Of course, some is not provable either way as it

Have you been hiding under a rock, or what? They've been lying
through their teeth from day one, and it's been demonstrated
time after time. The funniest one was the guy who swore up and
down that there was no enemy firefight when Kerry was awarded
his Silver Star... and it turns out in the same battle that jerk
was awarded a Bronze Star in a citation that explicitly said
his boat and all others came under enemy fire. He then tried to
blame Kerry for his being awarded a Bronze Star under false
pretenses!

1) The only indication of any smarts that I've ever heard of
from GW Bush, is that he was smart enough to *not* want to
go to Vietnam.

2) The best indication of any smarts that I've heard about
John Kerry is that when he returned from Vietnam he did
realize where he'd been and worked to put a stop to it.

One can also clearly see that the entire group of vets that are
lying about Kerry are not nearly as smart as either Kerry or
Bush, and not being as smart as Bush indicates a serious
deficiency...


The happiest day of my life was being declared 4F (medically
unfit for military service) after taking three medicals for
the US Army in the 60's. I am embarassed today that I did
very little to help stop the war.

--
FloydL. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)