Not to open up the "dinks are wothless" thread again, but I only keep count
of keeper bass in my logs. I know I've caught more dinks than keepers
overall too Andrew.

The thing that I can be proud of is that I've averaged far more than a
5-fish limit of keepers for every day I've fished this year. In my book
that's the most important factor. The total number of fish is
inconsequential to me.

Warren
--
http://www.warrenwolk.com/
http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions



"Andrew Kidd" wrote in message
news:WupYc.65784$9d6.50346@attbi_s54...
"alwaysfishking" wrote in message
...
While I have not kept track of hours on the lake I have 429 bass this
year.
I have no idea how many were dinks but I gotta say that a majority were
12
inchs or better. I am definetly not one to compare to. I have a very
unfair
advantage in the lakes here and the amount of time I can fish. My
average
size bass this year would be about 2 pounds +, I plan on keeping more
detailed logs next year. like baits and time spent. One thing I won't
track
is money spent :-)


If we had a 12" limit, I'm sure my percent would be a lot higher. But we
don't. Not like it really matters. I enjoy catching them to just about
any
size. I would like ot have a few larger ones this year, though. I think
my
largest is just over 4lb this year.

I used to keep a really detailed log. I think I got so detailed, it
became
a hassle, and I gave up on it. I'm just really hitting the high points on
this log.
--
Andrew Kidd
http://www.amiasoft.com/ - Software for the rest of us!
http://www.rofb.net/ - ROFB Newsgroup Home