On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:48:05 GMT, "Tim J."
wrote:


Now you're diluting my message with the "and/or" disclaimer. I distinctly linked
them all together.

To prove what ??

You'd be just as accurate with "sexist white male with a drinking
problem" (and most likely a Republican to boot :-)
My experiences in employment practices are fairly broad, and I've dealt with
many problems from all angles, including that one.

So why not use that one ??

I
don't *think* there was an implication to the contrary in your statement, but,
if so, I would resent it.

I didn't have the foggiest idea of your work environment
and no, that comment wasn't directed at you. I didn't
think that you owned your shop in any case.

I hear you ain't a bad fisherman, tho, as long as you don't
listen to afternoon radio on the way to the parking lot :-)
Greg, I think you know by now I don't let afternoon radio do my thinking for me.
It's interesting, though, each time a conservative point is being made, that
seems to be your cover. What's wrong? Al Franken not making the grade? ;-)

With respect to you and afternoons, that was a weak try at humor
to take some of the edge of the post.

WIth respect to Mr. Franken, I've never heard his show, but I have
heard Mr. Rush.

With respect to Mr. Rush, I have none. He is a self-indulgent
fascist who is making a lot of money convincing lazy people that
they really don't need more than a line or two on any subject to
know and understand all of the answers. And the more negative
these answers are towards their fellow citizens, the more satsified
they are and the more money Mr. Rush makes

And what are these great "conservative" ideas that I have tarred
with Mr. Rush's brush ? I'll give you one that I have picked
on:criticism of this administration's war policy is an attack on our
troops. Is that a "conservative point ?" Have you read any real
conservative publications lately ?