So I told him I asked why he was discriminating against Arizona, and if it
was a mistake from an incompetant web developer or if it was an over site.

Now Bob, I knew there was more to the story. When I asked you what you said in
your email, what you just posted isn't what you posted initialy. You posted
only that, "I asked him why he was discriminating against Arizona". That was
somewhat misleading, wouldn't you say? According to this post you actually said
quite a bit more, to which you got a nasty response.

First you insinuate the guy of discriminating against Arizona, something he has
every right to do for whatever reason he chooses to do so. Then you insult his
web developer by calling him "incompetent". Did it ever occur to you that the
person you spoke with on the phone and the web developer may be the same
person? How would you respond to being called incompetent over something that
could be a simple oversight, as you also suggested? Simply asking if the lack
of Arizona as an option was an oversight MIGHT not have resulted in the
response that you received. You're right; your email could have been more
'tactful', because starting off with an email that could be misinterpreted, and
obviously was, as hostile and then to expect a friendly reply is kind of
ridiculous. Don't you think?

And as far as the SPAM disclaimer you added with your information when you
registered on his website, until the Federal. Government passes the actual SPAM
legislation, you're S.O.L. on that as well.
-Jim Jr.
http://www.teamhornerfishing.com