On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:46:46 -0600, rw
wrote:

wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:07:14 -0600, rw
wrote:


wrote:

OK, but I'm not sure that's correct, and certainly not what I was trying
to convey. From what I know about it (which, admittedly, is pretty
limited),

... and which, of course, doesn't stop you from stating an uninformed
opinion.


Er, nope, wrong yet again...whatsamatter - have you been snorting
potatoes again or something - a _limited_ amount of knowledge is not
the same as "uninformed," and moreover, when you get down to it, by
definition, your knowledge is limited, as well and as such, your opinion
of my opinion would be based on your own limited knowledge...

In this case, my knowledge is quite a bit less limited than yours.

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R