Bob
Was all that gibberish what actually came up as my last post? That's
terrible...if so, I'll attempt to repost what should have been posted.

---
Now Bob, I knew there was more to the story. When I asked you what you said in
your email, what you initially posted isn't what you are saying now. You in
initially posted only that, "I asked him why he was discriminating against
Arizona?". That was somewhat misleading, wouldn't you say? According to your
most recent post, you actually said quite a bit more, to which you got a nasty
response. Now, I'm not condoning the way the guy acted, as I stated before I
think it's a terrible way for anyone to conduct business, but I can see where
he was coming from a little better now.

First you insinuated that the guy was discriminating against Arizona, something
he has every right to do for whatever reason he chooses to do so. Then you
insult his web developer by calling him "incompetent". Did it ever occur to you
that the person you spoke with on the phone and the web developer may be the
same person? How would you respond to being called "incompetent" over something
that could be a simple oversight, as you also suggested? Simply asking if the
lack of Arizona as an option was an oversight MIGHT not have resulted in the
response that you received. Then again, it may have had the same result. No one
will ever know. You're right; your email could have been more 'tactful' because
starting off with and email that could be misinterpreted, and obviously was
misinterpreted, as hostile and then to expect a friendly reply is kind of
ridiculous. Don't you think?

As far as the SPAM disclaimer you added with your information when you
registered with his website, until the Federal Government passes formal SPAM
legislation, you and everyone else are S.O.L. because the current filters are
only a temporary solution to an ever increasing problem.
-Jim Jr.
http://www.teamhornerfishing.com