William Claspy wrote:
On 11/1/04 8:40 PM, in article ,
"daytripper" wrote:


On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:37:28 -0500, William Claspy wrote:


On 11/1/04 6:23 PM, in article
. 4, "Scott Seidman"
wrote:


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/01/po...d-ballot.html?
hp&ex=1099371600&en=7fcbec2460759182&ei=5094&p artner=homepage

If this injunction holds, I withdraw my prediction for poll riots in
Cuyahoga county.

I meant to forward word of this to you, Scott. Glad you found it on your
own.

Believe me, I was glad when I heard the decision of those two judges! Means
I don't have to pack heat when I go to the polls tomorrow :-)

On the other hand, if they have the same octogenarians (nonagenarians?)
working the polls that were there last time around, there just may be a riot
yet!

Helping Ohio put the swing back into swing-state,
Bill

Republicans won their appeal, and it's unlikely to be overturned in time for
the poll openings.

Your polls will be watched and voters validated by partisans allied with the
current regime.

Lots o' luck to you...

/daytripper (Everything is turning Orwellian)


While I don't think (don't *think* mind you, but what do I know?) that my
polling place is one where either party is concerned with fraud, I haven't
gone up to vote yet. But now that I've had my second cup of joe, it's time
to lock and load (metaphorically speaking, of course) and run the gauntlet
of democracy!

Bill


hey bill,

it took me about 30 minutes to vote at 6:30am. i had to park a few
blocks away, but there no "challengers" at my polling place, and one of
the poll workers was a quite attractive young lady. so all in all, the
gauntlet wasn't so bad. how was it on your end?


--
chris
"my point? #@&*! you, that's my point." -- Bucky Katt