Tim J. wrote:
snip
Hmmmm. . . 1,2,4,8,16,32. . .
If it was exponential, wouldn't it be 1, 2, 4, 16, 256, 65536?

Never mind - another brain fart.
--
TL,
Tim
(who finds they are coming at an exponential rate lately)
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj