"rw" wrote in message
nk.net...
Because he had NO CHANCE OF WINNING!

Which leaves me believing that you would think we both should have stayed at
home on Nov. 2, 2004.

So I should have voted for YOUR candidate? Why shouldn't I be able to vote
for the candidate of my own choosing, regardless (sorry Jon) of his of her
chances of winning? Does my vote for say Mickey Mouse for POTUS somehow
void my right to express my social, political, or any other such opinions?
If, that, it is in fact your belief, then by your logic one would have to
have served in the military (or at the very least have proof that they had
tried to become a service member, but were denied such by the military) to
voice one's opinion on military matters--war included--right?

Sometimes I get the impression that you think that because you vote a
certain way, you're entitled to your preferred outcome.

What on Earth would give you that impression?

I get the distinct impression that you don't believe every American (legally
able to vote)should have the right to vote for the candidate of their
choosing for POTUS. Is this true? I say this because you have implied
such.


I certainly make no claims to a preferred outcome, but I do prefer outcomes
that are just and fair. However, I don't necessarily have to like the
resultant effect of said outcomes.

Mark