Cyli wrote:

On 6 Jan 2005 19:05:05 -0800, wrote:


The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?



Yeah. I didn't Google it, but it was weird enough to remember. The
facts of the damage were all different back then, as was the cause the
owner of the shop supposedly gave you for the damage.

Unless you're not the guy who claimed he got the waders in trade for
doing some work for the owner of the shop? But you certainly sound /
type like him.

Cyli

No telling what Steve was up to back then. He was trolling around here
for a while, under an alias. He's sent a vulgar(even by ROFF
standards)email to a woman, at another discussion group. That got him
band from the board. He's since posted under a new address, but that
went badly(to put it mildly)for him too. Just when I start to feel bad
for him, he does something like post what he did here.

I've received that email from the fly shop, and i've seen the pictures
of the waders in question. I doubt anyone, with any sense, would say
these waders were defective, or should be covered under warranty. The
rest of Steve's history with this fly shop, and his own actions on
several boards, just bolsters the fly shops assertions.

It's never Steve's fault. Shame on us!

brians,....well not you specifically, but us in general. :-)