On Mar 25, 9:48*pm, Giles wrote:
On Mar 25, 2:40*pm, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:31:14 -0700, "JT"

wrote:
http://ravallirepublic.com/news/loca...ba62-5175-9af0....

Yes I agree !!! Good deal
Thanks for this post
*as I have been following HB30 9from afar

Fred

And just think what might have happened if advocates on either side of
the issue spoke something resembling English!

Huzzah!

g.
but, enough of the spectacular......anybody noticed anything
concerning the mundane lately?

No?

O.k. Let's stick to the topic at hand, then. Teddy said, "The
doctine of private ownership of water apart from land cannot prevail
without causing enduring damage." He was right.....of course.

However, he missed the glaringly obvious corollary that the dcotrine
of private ownership of water, regardless of land, cannot prevail
without causing enduring and crippling damage.

And then there's the nearly universally rejected fact that the private
ownership of land cannot prevail without causing catastrophic and
effectively permanent damage.

giles
go fish.