Scott,

It seems your entire purpose here is to be a stick in the mud. You've posted
incorrect information several times. Is there a purpose to your negativity
and disinformation? You even have non-proponents calling you on this.

Richard Hamel
Proponent
rec.outdoors.fishing.tournaments



"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"WARREN WOLK" wrote in
news:xBGcg.4945$ei2.1908@trndny02:


I'm a bit confused Scott - why is the categorization of a
tournament-based newsgroup here or there even a concern to you? If
you don't subscribe you don't see it, right?


I don't think its overly concerning me. It's an RFD, and I think the
proposed group would fit better in rec.sports than rec.outdoors. This is
what an RFD is for.

FWIW, I'd vote yes when it comes to it in a call for votes if it were in
rec.sports, and I'd vote no if it were in rec.outdoors. I think others
might take the same position, and some my be OK with it in either case.

Also, the revised charter still specifies bass tourneys. I thought the
revision was to open it to all tourneys, which I think is an excellent
idea.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply