rw wrote:
wrote:

Well, for me it was when you started going off about a fish's family
"mourning" for it. That was way over the top, and I knew when I read it
that no one would ever take you seriously.

That was just a bad typo. I'm glad someone brought that to my
attention. I cleared that up at
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...af68ed8?hl=en&
but unfortunately some people probably missed it.

Many animals are known to suffer distress after the loss of a mate and
die soon afterwards, but I wasn't making that point.