"Opus" wrote in message ...

Are you saying that you don't "accept" my point or just that you don't
like replacing the word PETA, for the word Christian?

If it is the case that you don't "accept" my fine and well thought out
argument, well, you can just blow me, you filthy pig-mouthed scumbag!
:~^ )

It's truly sad how an otherwise fine discussion goes all to hell, over
religion!


Consider Picasso's "blue period" piece of The Old Guitarist. A seminal
work, bridging period genres and one of the turning pieces of art pointing
out the direction of modernism.

Except, substitute Picasso with Renoir, substitute a blue theme with lively
colors, substitute the old guitarist with a young female ballet dancer in a
mid-twirl, and we have the same painting making the same arguement. Right?

What I am saying is that I do not accept the substitution of those words.
Not in the context of that specific discussion nor in any other actually.
There is no conceptual equality of those words worthy - to me at least - of
discussion.

Besides, PETA has some linkage to fishing. Come to think of it, Christ did
too when he divided the fishes and loaves to feed the gathering, but I don't
believe PETA would have approved of that menu either.

Sorry to hear about your back surgery.