"riverman" wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 6:22 pm, Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:
riverman wrote:

snip

In any case, no one knows what caused the collapse, nor can they
account for the fuel supply or any other reason for it to have
happened. That alone should raise eyebrows.

I thought the claim was damage from the other buildings collapsing coupled
with a diesel tank that was from emergency generators?


Read the FEMA report. That's one scenario that they propose, but they
state that their best models have an extremely low probability. They
admit that they don't really know what was the mechanism. They also
discount that the building acquired much damage as compared to other
buildings nearby. You state that claim with much more certainty than
the folks who propose it.

well, i may be naive, or trusting, or just plain stupid, but surely to
*god*. myron, you are not suggesting that there is some rational possibility
that our own government had some conscious part in a nefarious scheme to
blow up buildings, kill citizens, or to cover up such activities, etc?

tell me that i am hopelessly confused and lamentably mistaken.

yfitons
wayno

--riverman