![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end up either
vertical at best, or more commonly pointing forward. I've tried twisting them as I wind them around to get them to lay back, and have tried tying them on several different ways: with the stripped nub over the top of the shaft, under it, parallel to it etc., and have experimented with how I orient the curve of the hackle. I'm missing something, as I just cannot get the palmered hackle to lay the right way; pointing backwards down the fly. What's the trick? --riverman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() riverman When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end riverman up either vertical at best, or more commonly pointing riverman forward. ... What's the trick? Hi Myron! The experts will give you the correct answer soon, but I've always solved this problem by using reverse palmering: http://www.frontrangeanglers.com/new...ersehackle.htm -- Jarmo Hurri Commercial email countermeasures included in header email address. Remove all garbage from header email address when replying, or just use . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() riverman When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end riverman up either vertical at best, or more commonly pointing riverman forward. ... What's the trick? Hi Myron! The experts will give you the correct answer soon, but I've always solved this problem by using reverse palmering: http://www.frontrangeanglers.com/new...ersehackle.htm -- Jarmo Hurri Commercial email countermeasures included in header email address. Remove all garbage from header email address when replying, or just use . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() riverman When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end riverman up either vertical at best, or more commonly pointing riverman forward. ... What's the trick? Hi Myron! The experts will give you the correct answer soon, but I've always solved this problem by using reverse palmering: http://www.frontrangeanglers.com/new...ersehackle.htm -- Jarmo Hurri Commercial email countermeasures included in header email address. Remove all garbage from header email address when replying, or just use . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jarmo Hurri" wrote in message ... riverman When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end riverman up either vertical at best, or more commonly pointing riverman forward. ... What's the trick? Hi Myron! The experts will give you the correct answer soon, but I've always solved this problem by using reverse palmering: http://www.frontrangeanglers.com/new...ersehackle.htm -- Jarmo Hurri Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jarmo Hurri" wrote in message ... riverman When I tie Wooly Buggers, the hackle fibers inevitably end riverman up either vertical at best, or more commonly pointing riverman forward. ... What's the trick? Hi Myron! The experts will give you the correct answer soon, but I've always solved this problem by using reverse palmering: http://www.frontrangeanglers.com/new...ersehackle.htm -- Jarmo Hurri Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. --riverman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:05 +0100, "riverman" wrote:
Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. I palmer my wooly buggers that way for durability. As to 2), if you don't reverse palmer just tie the tip of the hackle in at the hook bend instead of the butt. -- Charlie... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:05 +0100, "riverman" wrote:
Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. I palmer my wooly buggers that way for durability. As to 2), if you don't reverse palmer just tie the tip of the hackle in at the hook bend instead of the butt. -- Charlie... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charlie Choc" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:05 +0100, "riverman" wrote: Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. I palmer my wooly buggers that way for durability. As to 2), if you don't reverse palmer just tie the tip of the hackle in at the hook bend instead of the butt. Yes, thats the correct method, but I keep breaking them that way. I hate that...gotta get a lighter touch. On another track...I just tied up my first #12 Red Humpy. Didn't have any antron for the body, so I sliced up some red marabou and dubbed with it....that part came out pretty nice. However, getting the 'wings' to sit up in a nice tight little package was very hard, as they seem to want to spin out into a fuzzball. And judging the length of deerhair to tie on so that it makes the wing cases and wings the right length is nutso. My first humpy looks more like a big grey burdock with a hangover. --riverman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charlie Choc" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:05 +0100, "riverman" wrote: Hey Jarmo; Yep, thats what I was leading myself into also. I think thats how MC showed me to do it in Denmark, also, but I haven't tied any wooly buggers in a while and forgot! I can see three distinct advantages to it: 1) the hackle lies back the way it's supposed to 2) since the longer hairs are up near the head, the shape of the fly is more like a bait fish 3) the windings over the top lock down the palmered hackle so that it won't unwind if some fish bites it once too often. Seeing as how its not a floating fly, the extra trips up the shaft of the fly with the thread don't cause any negative effect on the weight, either. I think I might just reverse palmer and not even care about why my straight palmers don't curl right. I palmer my wooly buggers that way for durability. As to 2), if you don't reverse palmer just tie the tip of the hackle in at the hook bend instead of the butt. Yes, thats the correct method, but I keep breaking them that way. I hate that...gotta get a lighter touch. On another track...I just tied up my first #12 Red Humpy. Didn't have any antron for the body, so I sliced up some red marabou and dubbed with it....that part came out pretty nice. However, getting the 'wings' to sit up in a nice tight little package was very hard, as they seem to want to spin out into a fuzzball. And judging the length of deerhair to tie on so that it makes the wing cases and wings the right length is nutso. My first humpy looks more like a big grey burdock with a hangover. --riverman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|